Python; name bindings are not object references?

I am trying to understand what exactly a Python name binding is, and when this binding is interpreted.

In c,

include <stdio.h> int main() { int X = 42; int* Y[1]; Y[0] = &X; X = 666; printf("%d", *Y[0]); return 0; }

prints 666. I was expecting the block of Python code:

X = 42 L = [] L.append(X) #3 X = 666 print(L) #5

to do the same, but it does not. What exactly happens between the lines labeled 3 and 5? Does #3 make another reference to the object known as "42", like X, lets call it X', and store X' in the object pointed to by L, which is []?


What you state is almost what happens:

X = 42 # Create new object 42, bind name X to it. L = [] L.append(X) # Bind L[0] to the 42 object. X = 666 # Create new object 666, bind name X to it. print(L) # Will not see the 666.

The append is not binding the array element to the X, it's binding it to the object behind X, which is the 42.

When I first realised this is the way Python worked, things (specifically, things like this which had previously confused me and caused much angst and gnashing of teeth) became so much clearer.

人吐槽 人点赞



用户名: 密码:
验证码: 匿名发表


查看评论:Python; name bindings are not object references?